Iphone 12 Pro Max Batterie Mah
Apple brought out its iPhone 12 Pro Max in October 2020. Landing in our Ultra-Premium segment (above $800), the iPhone brings with it a large 6.vii-inch OLED display that supports HDR10 content, and a triple-camera setup (along with a lidar sensor). Unlike most other phones in our database thus far, however, it does non come with a charger.
We recently tested the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's battery performance and will relate our most important findings in this review.
Primal specifications:
-
- Bombardment capacity: 3687 mAh
- 20W charger non included
- Wireless charging
- half dozen.7-inch, 1284 x 2778, 60 Hz OLED display
- Apple A14 Bionic (v nm) chipset, 5G
- Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 6 GB
About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. This article highlights the near important results of our testing. (See our introductory and how we examination articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)
Test summary
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
78
battery
70
Best: Vivo Y72 5G (104)
64
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (96)
68
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (100)
74
Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (118)
72
All-time: Realme GT Neo 3 (111)
54
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (105)
116
Best: Apple iPhone thirteen Pro (121)
Position in Global Ranking 33rd
6. Apple iPhone xiii Pro Max
89
10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
88
xv. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
86
xv. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
86
15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
86
21. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
85
23. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
84
31. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
eighty
33. Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max
78
33. Xiaomi Redmi Notation ten 5G
78
54. Motorola Moto G9 Ability
70
54. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
70
57. Samsung Milky way S21 5G (Snapdragon)
69
sixty. Samsung Milky way A52 5G
67
64. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
64
66. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
63
76. Samsung Milky way S22+ (Exynos)
60
76. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
sixty
76. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
60
81. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
59
86. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
57
87. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
55
89. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
51
90. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
fifty
94. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
45
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking 3rd
1. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
89
iii. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
78
7. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
70
11. Samsung Milky way S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
64
thirteen. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
lx
13. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
60
16. Samsung Milky way S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
57
Pros
- Provides 2 days of autonomy in moderate usage (49 hours)
- Considerably lower power consumption (belch) than the contest
Cons
- Depression total charging efficiency
- Very slow charging after 80% to reach total battery capacity
With an overall Battery score of 78, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max puts in a respectable performance that lands it in the top four in our database so far. While it has an average score for Charging, and an higher up-average score for Autonomy, it is the current score leader for Efficiency thus far (but as ever, numbers solitary don't quite tell the whole story).
Nosotros compared the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's functioning in several key categories with 2 other ultra-premium devices, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) and the Oppo Find X3 Pro; battery chapters, charger, display type and resolution, and processor specifications for all three devices are shown in the tabular array below.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max | Samsung Milky way S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) | Oppo Find X3 Pro | |
Battery (mAh) | 3687 | 5000 | 4500 |
Charger (Due west) | 20W | 25W | 65W |
Display blazon | OLED | AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
Resolution | 1284 x 2778 | 1440 ten 3200 | 1440 x 3216 |
Processor | Apple A14 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 |
Autonomy (67)
How long a battery accuse lasts depends non only on battery capacity, merely likewise other aspects of the phone's hardware and software. The DXOMARK Battery autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: (one) Stationary, (ii) On the go, and (iii) Calibrated utilize cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.
71h
Low-cal Usage
Active: 2h30/mean solar day
49h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/mean solar day
30h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/24-hour interval
At 67, the Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max's Autonomy score puts information technology into the upper half of devices tested so far (regardless of segment), and is better than the Autonomy scores for all other ultra-premium smartphones to date. Allow's now dive into some specifics.
Stationary
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
lxx
104
Vivo Y72 5G
Best: Vivo Y72 5G (104)
A robot housed in a Faraday muzzle performs a set of touch-based user actions during what nosotros call our "typical usage scenario" (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — iv hours of active employ over the course of a 16-hr menses, plus 8 hours of "sleep." The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max achieved an to a higher place-average score of lxx in our stationary TUS testing, again leading all other ultra-premium devices in our database to date, and providing more than two days — 61+ hours — of autonomy, some 4.5 hours more the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) and about exactly more than 15 hours than the Oppo Observe X3 Pro used in our comparison here.
Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves
On the go
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
64
96
Samsung Galaxy M51
All-time: Samsung Galaxy M51 (96)
Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra "hidden" demands, such equally the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network choice, for instance. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone exterior and perform a precisely divers prepare of activities while following the same three-60 minutes travel itinerary for each device.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max's on the go score of 64 is only average — a few points behind the Samsung, but ahead of the Oppo Discover X3 Pro past fifteen points. The Apple device is better for camera utilise on the get than both competitors, but it trails the Samsung just a little in all other activities (phone calls, GPS, social apps).
Autonomy for on the become employ cases (full charge)
Calibrated
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
68
100
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Milky way M51 (100)
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a fourth dimension. Starting from an lxxx% accuse, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their bombardment power.
Among the three ultra-premium devices in this comparing, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max took elevation honors over the Samsung Milky way S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) by a few points, and by nearly xx points over the Oppo Discover X3 Pro, showing amend functioning than both in 4G music and video streaming. That said, it was behind the Samsung device for 3G calling and video playback.
Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full accuse)
Charging (74)
The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, Total accuse and Quick heave. Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power judge; measure how long information technology takes to charge a battery from 0% to eighty% chapters and from 80 to 100%; and measure how long and how much power the bombardment takes to go from an indicated 100% to an actual total charge. With the phone at different accuse levels (xx%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick heave tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives later being plugged in for 5 minutes.
Wired
Wireless
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has relatively practiced charging time (considering the ability of its charger) until information technology reaches 80%; later on that, it charges very slowly when compared to the Samsung and especially when compared to the Oppo, for a total charging time of two hours 27 minutes versus i hr 28 minutes for the Samsung and just under 37 minutes for the Oppo.
Power consumption and battery level during full charge
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
Full charge
Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max
74
118
Realme GT Neo 3
Best: Realme GT Neo iii (118)
Although it cannot compete at all with the Find X3 Pro's astonishing sub-score of 104 (achieved via its 65W charger), the Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max isn't too far behind the Snapdragon version of the Samsung S21 Ultra in our total charge testing. The Apple device takes much longer than the competition to go from 80% to 100% — most a full hour versus nearly 20 minutes for the Samsung (and only about half-dozen minutes for the Oppo).
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max's wireless charging takes 3 hours 1 minute to charge to 100% (per the device UI) and an additional 28 minutes to reach total charge capacity, which is nearly twice as long as the lightning-fast Oppo Notice X3 Pro.
Quick boost
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
72
111
Realme GT Neo 3
Best: Realme GT Neo 3 (111)
Although it comes in terminal amid the iii devices compared in this review (just just very slightly behind the Samsung), the iPhone 12 Pro Max provides nearly three.v hours of autonomy when plugged in at less than 50% ability remaining.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max | Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon) | Oppo Find X3 Pro | ||
Autonomy boost (hh:mm) | xx% | 3:17 | 3:24 | v:49 |
40% | 3:sixteen | 3:22 | half-dozen:36 | |
threescore% | 3:03 | 2:54 | 4:twoscore | |
lxxx% | 1:24 | 2:11 | 3:25 | |
Pct boost | 20% | 8.2 % | ix.two % | 18.4 % |
xl% | eight.ii % | 9.one % | 20.9 % | |
60% | vii.half-dozen % | 7.eight % | xiv.7 % | |
80% | 3.v % | v.9 % | x.8 % | |
Energy consumed | 20% | 1768 mWh | 2279 mWh | 4020 mWh |
40% | 1764 mWh | 2262 mWh | 4563 mWh | |
60% | 1645 mWh | 1950 mWh | 3223 mWh | |
fourscore% | 761 mWh | 1468 mWh | 2360 mWh |
While the Apple device takes a fairly quick 45 seconds to gain 1% battery power while gaming at low battery, that's nonetheless a few seconds behind both the Samsung and the Oppo in our testing.
Efficiency (94)
Our Efficiency score comprises two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge. Charge upwards is the efficiency of a full accuse (how much free energy is drained from the wall outlet vs the energy capacity of the battery, as well as the efficiency of the charger and its rest consumption). Belch is how much current the smartphone drains from the battery when in use (the ratio of battery capacity over autonomy). Meliorate autonomy with a smaller battery means better efficiency.
Accuse up
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
54
105
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
All-time: Nubia RedMagic seven Pro (105)
While its somewhat small 20W adapter by itself is quite efficient, the Apple device's overall charging system (which includes not just the accuse adapter but also internal smartphone circuits) was ane of its merely true weak points, coming in backside non merely its Samsung and Oppo rivals in this review, merely as well behind the bulk of devices in our database thus far.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max takes nearly an hour to get from lxxx% to 100%.
Discharge
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
116
121
Apple iPhone thirteen Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro (121)
The Apple tree iPhone 12 Pro Max's 116 points for discharge efficiency towers far above all others in our database thus far, with only one other device showing a triple-digit score (the Wiko Ability U30 in our Essential segment, with 102 points). It has lower consumption than all devices in both agile hours and in the nighttime, and among its competitors in this review, it shows considerably lower consumption than either the Samsung or the Oppo for music and video streaming.
Determination
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is among the top 4 in our Battery database so far, with skillful scores in Autonomy, average in Charging, and an outstanding score for discharge in our Efficiency attribute. Where it could accept done better was in accuse upward Efficiency, where its score was among the lowest amid all devices tested so far (but 66% charging efficiency).
Iphone 12 Pro Max Batterie Mah,
Source: https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-12-pro-max-battery-review-excellent-consumption-manager/#:~:text=Battery%20capacity%3A%203687%20mAh
Posted by: furlonghatiankin.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Iphone 12 Pro Max Batterie Mah"
Post a Comment